Community

Coordinate working groups for open competency data.

OSC shows formats for expert exchange, pilot work and transfer. Working groups document requirements, open questions and review results so skills data can evolve across organizations in a traceable way. Results are described as recommendations only after review.

View appointments Suggest topic

Formats

Formats for exchange, piloting and transfer.

Each format has a clear result: a data model, an example, a decision template or a documented practical experience. Contributions remain recognizable as work status until review and approval have taken place.

Format 1

Working groups

Domain and technical groups deepen data models, evidence and governance as working drafts.

Format 2

Pilot sprints

Members review reference patterns with concrete use cases and document results.

Format 3

Open materials

Practice reports, playbooks and reference artifacts should be provided as reviewed working drafts.

Working groups

Active working groups from TGroups.

The overview loads publishable workgroups from the TGroup objects in the current environment. Private or closed groups will not be included in this public feed.

Request participation
Working groups are loaded.

Duty cycle

Need, Pilot, Test, Release.

Community activities combine open discussion with binding documentation. Each session should produce a concrete artifact: field list, example, decision template or test result.

Find the next appointment Suggest topic
  1. 01Describe needs and target group
  2. 02Assign working group or sprint
  3. 03Test with examples and test questions
  4. 04Document results, limits and next steps

Participation

Open entry. Binding documentation.

Community contributions are curated. New participants find orientation without having to immediately declare membership. Working groups document decisions, open questions and test results.

Read along

Track public updates

News, dates and results notes show which topics are in progress and where feedback is needed.

View updates
Insert

Submit use case or test question

A specific need helps to check standards for data, roles, interfaces and decisions.

Suggest topic
Check also

Support working groups and piloting

Participants can prioritize requirements, review artifacts, classify pilot findings and document implementations.

View participation

Results

Exchanges become verifiable work statuses.

Community formats are designed for usable interim results. This helps participants to quickly identify what has already been clarified and where further expertise is needed.

Models

Field lists and terms

Common minimum fields, definitions and open semantic questions are versioned.

Practice

Examples and pilot notes

Use cases show which assumptions work and which limits become visible.

Review

Test questions and decisions

Working groups record what has been decided, postponed or flagged for legal review.

Transfer

Materials for implementation teams

Playbooks, reference artifacts, and notes support the next implementation step.

Next dates

Exchange with working groups and piloting.

All dates